Pressure to reduce USA drinking age grows

In the USA 5,000 people below the age of 21 die each year because of excessive alcohol consumption. Yet this has triggered a new movement to lower the drinking age.

In the USA, young people can vote, drive, marry, divorce, hunt and go to war before alcohol is legally allowed to touch their lips. Many states once set their minimum drinking-age at 18. But in 1984 Ronald Reagan oversaw the passage of the “21 law”, which requires states to set 21 as the minimum drinking-age or risk losing 10% of their highway funds.

Supporters of the status quo say that the law has averted thousands of fatalities. But sceptics point out that other countries, like Canada, have seen similar declines, even though their drinking-age is 18. They also argue that barring young people from drinking does not stop them from consuming alcohol: it just makes them drink more quickly.

Now campaigners want to move it back. In the past, states have been too fiscally timid to challenge the 21 law. But calls for change are growing louder. Two local magistrates in South Carolina recently ruled that banning 18- to 20-year-olds from drinking or possessing alcohol is unconstitutional. Public officials, including the former attorney general of South Dakota, have called the 21 law a failure. The about-face of Morris Chafetz, a doctor who served on the commission that recommended increasing the drinking-age to 21, has also raised eyebrows. This week he called it the most regrettable decision of his career.

Read the rest of this item from The Economist here